Toms River Faces Divided Debate Over Proposed Homeless Shelter in Residential Neighborhood

March 30, 2025 03:50 pm

A proposed 17-bed homeless shelter in a Toms River residential neighborhood has sparked significant debate, with strong opinions on both sides. A local church, in partnership with the Affordable Housing Alliance (AHA), has applied for approval to add the shelter to its property at 415 Washington Street. The plan has ignited a contentious discussion about the balance between addressing homelessness and preserving the character of the neighborhood.

 

The shelter would operate in the parish center, which already hosts an outreach program for the homeless. AHA’s proposal includes strict operational guidelines, including a 5 p.m. to 7 a.m. sheltering window, where only 17 adults would be allowed to stay overnight. To ensure safety, the shelter would implement security measures such as bag checks, locked doors, and background checks for potential residents. Those visibly intoxicated would be denied entry.

 

However, the proposal is not without opposition. Homeless shelters are not permitted in residential zones under current zoning laws, and the church has applied for a variance to allow this facility. To gain approval, they must demonstrate that the shelter meets both positive and negative criteria. Supporters argue that a homeless shelter fits within the mission of helping the poor and needy, making it an “inherently beneficial use” of the property. They point to the long history of the church and its commitment to serving the community as a reason why the shelter aligns with its purpose.

 

On the other hand, opponents worry about the potential impact of the shelter on the neighborhood. Concerns about property values, safety, and neighborhood disruption have led to vocal opposition. Some residents, including those who have experienced homelessness themselves, believe that while the shelter may help a few, it doesn’t provide a meaningful long-term solution to the larger issue of homelessness. Additionally, critics question whether the shelter’s operation truly qualifies as an accessory use to the church, given the involvement of the AHA as a separate entity managing the shelter.

 

Despite the opposition, there is significant support for the shelter from local advocacy groups and community leaders. Toms River has one of the highest concentrations of homelessness in Ocean County, with many individuals living in tents or cars, while others are forced to rely on temporary solutions like motels. The lack of available shelter space has placed a strain on local services, making this proposal a critical issue for those advocating for better resources for the unhoused.

 

The zoning board has been holding hearings on the proposal since September 2024, with the latest session scheduled for April 10, 2025. While no final decision has been made, the ongoing debate underscores the tension between addressing a pressing social issue and maintaining the character of established neighborhoods. As the hearings continue, the future of the proposed shelter remains uncertain, with both sides presenting strong arguments about its potential benefits and drawbacks.

Leave a Reply

Toms River Faces Divided Debate Over Proposed Homeless Shelter in Residential Neighborhood

March 30, 2025 03:50 pm

A proposed 17-bed homeless shelter in a Toms River residential neighborhood has sparked significant debate, with strong opinions on both sides. A local church, in partnership with the Affordable Housing Alliance (AHA), has applied for approval to add the shelter to its property at 415 Washington Street. The plan has ignited a contentious discussion about the balance between addressing homelessness and preserving the character of the neighborhood.

 

The shelter would operate in the parish center, which already hosts an outreach program for the homeless. AHA’s proposal includes strict operational guidelines, including a 5 p.m. to 7 a.m. sheltering window, where only 17 adults would be allowed to stay overnight. To ensure safety, the shelter would implement security measures such as bag checks, locked doors, and background checks for potential residents. Those visibly intoxicated would be denied entry.

 

However, the proposal is not without opposition. Homeless shelters are not permitted in residential zones under current zoning laws, and the church has applied for a variance to allow this facility. To gain approval, they must demonstrate that the shelter meets both positive and negative criteria. Supporters argue that a homeless shelter fits within the mission of helping the poor and needy, making it an “inherently beneficial use” of the property. They point to the long history of the church and its commitment to serving the community as a reason why the shelter aligns with its purpose.

 

On the other hand, opponents worry about the potential impact of the shelter on the neighborhood. Concerns about property values, safety, and neighborhood disruption have led to vocal opposition. Some residents, including those who have experienced homelessness themselves, believe that while the shelter may help a few, it doesn’t provide a meaningful long-term solution to the larger issue of homelessness. Additionally, critics question whether the shelter’s operation truly qualifies as an accessory use to the church, given the involvement of the AHA as a separate entity managing the shelter.

 

Despite the opposition, there is significant support for the shelter from local advocacy groups and community leaders. Toms River has one of the highest concentrations of homelessness in Ocean County, with many individuals living in tents or cars, while others are forced to rely on temporary solutions like motels. The lack of available shelter space has placed a strain on local services, making this proposal a critical issue for those advocating for better resources for the unhoused.

 

The zoning board has been holding hearings on the proposal since September 2024, with the latest session scheduled for April 10, 2025. While no final decision has been made, the ongoing debate underscores the tension between addressing a pressing social issue and maintaining the character of established neighborhoods. As the hearings continue, the future of the proposed shelter remains uncertain, with both sides presenting strong arguments about its potential benefits and drawbacks.

Leave a Reply